7+ REASONS WHY THE "19 ARABS" THESIS CRUMBLES INTO RUBBLE

 

But now that we are at it, let us consider relatively briefly what many other researchers have spent a great deal of time explicating: the numerous and manifold problems (in addition to what was mentioned above) with the 9/11 OS.

 

It should be emphasized that my aim here isn’t to render an exhaustive or comprehensive enumeration of every credible objection to what has been asserted to be the “truth” of the events which took place on September 11, 2001. Instead, the following list will simply be a brief sketch of well-recorded anomalies, all of which many other writers, bloggers, podcasters, and vloggers have addressed in far greater detail elsewhere.

 

1) As already mentioned, being able to crash large passenger planes into three targets (WTC1, WTC2, and the Pentagon) suggests a great deal of precision and skill on the part of the alleged “Arab hijackers,” putting them at least on par with some of the most experienced specialist “Top Gun”-worthy flyboys in existence, yet such a notion is belied by all available information concerning the records of those of the “gang of 19” who took flying lessons on a plane much smaller than a passenger jet, and who to a man performed in a less than stellar manner in such circumstances, suggesting strongly that their piloting skills were significantly less adept than should have been required to pull off such delicate and complicated maneuvers as were allegedly executed at these three locations.

 

2a) It appears that none of the names of the alleged “gang of 19” actually even show up on any of the authentic passenger manifests of the planes ostensibly involved in the seeming  kamikaze-like attacks upon the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon, nor the fourth ostensibly hijacked plane which allegedly crashed in rural Pennsylvania. This, in turn, suggests strongly that this “gang of 19” never actually set foot upon the very vessels whose cockpits, we are told, they seized by wielding boxcutters as weapons, prior to displaying aviator chops well beyond their apparent piloting skill-set in order to single-handedly wreak such havoc that, as we shall see, beggars belief in and of itself (but more of that anon), but strikes one as even less likely if the alleged perpetrators weren’t even present and accounted for to wreak said havoc in the first place.

 

2b) Moreover, it seems that many of this same “gang of 19” (as many as 10, it has been alleged) have surfaced alive and well, indignantly insisting that they did not perish on September 11^th, and had absolutely nothing to do with this alleged plot involving 19 boxcutter-wielding Arabs who suddenly and inexplicably developed high-level flight skills at the last fateful minute in order to pull off an incredibly intricate and sophisticated attack on three major US targets.

 

Thus, taking both 2a and 2b into account, it would seem that at least many, and perhaps ALL of the alleged hijackers never boarded these flights, which obviously throws the 9/11 OS into disarray.

 

3) Many of the purported cell phone calls from passengers and flight attendants—which reportedly were made after the alleged hijackers supposedly seized control of the planes—could simply not have taken place in accord with the OS timeline and sequence of events, given cell phone technology in 2001 and the reported altitude of the planes during the times when these phone calls were logged. Even long after 2001, successfully making a cell phone call from a passenger plane at cruising altitude was well-nigh impossible.

 

4a) Apparently, passenger planes, such as those which reported to have struck the two towers in New York and the Pentagon in DC could not have reached the velocity attributed to them, given the low altitude, as they would have been physically torn apart due to atmospheric pressure.

 

4b) It likewise seems that these same passenger planes, whose fuselages were composed mostly of aluminum alloy, would not be able to blast right through a steel-reinforced skyscraper, to all appearances “like a hot knife through butter,” even to the point of the nose of the craft emerging from the opposite side of the building, as footage of the alleged “second plane” appears to show, quite contrary to generally observable laws of physical science when it comes to thin, tinny aluminum objects tending to founder upon solid, steel ones. It would be something akin to witnessing, say, a falling piece of pine straw not merely successfully puncturing the trunk of a pine tree, but also managing to poke all the way through and emerge from the other side of the trunk.

 

5) Apparently, it is likewise highly unlikely (again, to the point of near-impossibility), that a global collapse of two standing structures like WTC 1 and 2-- putting aside momentarily the even greater difficulties surrounding the collapse of WTC7-- could be attributable to flying objects crashing into them. The buildings were, in fact, constructed for the purpose of being able to withstand “multiple collisions” by planes.

 

But even if it could be demonstrated that severe damage had indeed been inflicted; if, say, certain floors had caved in on other floors due to tresses and bulwarks being weakened at the point of entry of the supposed “planes” (putting aside for a moment the patent absurdity of aluminum-cased passenger planes with hollow fuselages managing to enter one side of a steel-reinforced structure, plow all the way through and poke out of the other side, in relatively undamaged and generally “pristine” condition—calling to mind, again, the remarkably “pristine” state of the “magic bullet” found at Dealy Plaza), there is still little if any explanation for what actually happened to the Towers. No collision (and no resultant office fire) could cause these massive structures, not simply to sag or buckle, but to transform into dust, as incredibly took place in the case of both buildings.

 

There is a great deal of theorizing concerning the likely mechanism behind this extraordinary “dustification” of formerly massive steel-framed buildings, and the fact that molten temperatures were recorded in both structures’ ruins for weeks afterwards, and for the twisting and warping of metal structures both at and in the proximity of the buildings’ ruins, but these concerns exceed the scope of my inquiry; it is sufficient here merely to note that these dramatic collapses, better described as instances of what could be called wholesale dissolvings of formerly solid structures, can hardly be attributed to these structures merely being weakened due to the impact of flying objects (i.e., so-called “planes”).

 

6) Of course there is the entire subject of WTC7’s destruction, which makes even less sense, as this structure was never hit by any flying object, and it fell in a quick and generally symmetrical manner suggestive of controlled demolition, yet we are told to believe that a few fires set in the building due to stray, adrift pieces of shrapnel caused this building’s sudden, global collapse. Among the rest of the manifold absurdities of the 9/11 OS, this one just seems patently egregious. Even the normiest of normies would no doubt find this tenet of the OS pretty hard to choke down, much less to swallow, were they somehow to become aware of it... In fact, if any detail of the 9/11 OS can be said to act as a “gateway” to the proverbial “rabbit hole” that is 9/11 revisionism, this would be it… if not for 7 (no, not the just covered Building 7; rather, for the item listed below….)

 

7) The 9/11 OS would have us forswear reason, logic, and basic physical science in numerous respects, but no greater concession is demanded than that which tells us that some of the hjjackers’ passports were “discovered” at the scenes of the alleged terrorist crimes, having in some miraculous manner survived the complete vaporization of both the planes and everything and everyone on board when those vehicles crashed, burned…. and then inexplicably disappeared. Yet a passport belonging to one alleged Arab terrorist somehow escaped the frightful destruction, leapt out of the plane, and fell onto the New York City streets in an only mildly-singed state, to be quickly discovered by a Johnny-on-the-spot law enforcement mogul, and thus became “proof” of the “gang of 19” thesis (which by this time had already been extensively seeded into public consciousness by nearly all outlets of the compliant and complicit corporate media)… 

 

Later, another miracle passport was found at the alleged wreckage site in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; once again, the little blue book of laminated paper apparently managed to find its way out of a supposed  crashed “passenger airliner” whose destruction was so thorough that hardly anything resembling a plane (or corpses, or luggage, or anything else)) could even could be discerned… yet that Arab hijacker terrorist’s passport survived amongst all of the heaps of unrecognizably charred ash, providing further “evidence” that the four alleged planes and their unfortunate crew and passengers met their fates at the hands of that same ubiquitous “gang of 19.”

 

      ******************

 

The abovementioned problematical and/or contradictory aspects of the 9/11 OS are, again, far from exhaustive. There is much more that could be added—aspects of this event that others have uncovered, such as apparent foreknowledge of events in certain high-echelon circles, as evidenced by the fact that certain elites added to their already deep pockets by ordering “put options” on airline stock mere days before 9/11.

 

Foreknowledge is also strongly implied by the fact that several members of an Israeli company reported getting warnings not to go to work that morning… and then of course there are the “dancing Israelis” of infamy, who apparently showed up at a certain post which overlooked the towers at an early hour, awaited the coming carnage with keen anticipation--their cameras, binoculars and other equipment primed and at the ready—then, according to several witnesses, greeted the seemingly expected destruction with ghastly jubilation. (Later, after being inexplicably released from custody and allowed to return to the home country, one of the men proclaimed on an Israeli talk show that, “Our purpose was to record the event.”)

 

There is indeed plenty of 9/11 “funny business” regarding Israel, as well as some regarding Saudi Arabia, that has received more than a modicum of attention (outside of mainstream “news” circles, wherein such connections are determinedly ignored). There is also the curious fact that September 11, 2001 happened to be the date when the Pentagon comptroller chose to run numerous drills-- including one which involved passenger airplanes flying into buildings, including the Pentagon!—with the result that many of those involved in the drills had no idea that “real life” events were taking place, creating a great deal of confusion and making a prompt response to the “real world” situation impossible.

 

All of these stories are important to document, since they provide ever greater evidence of fraud, deception, and corruption, but explicating upon these matters any further is not part of my current task.

 

Instead, I intend to ask, and attempt to answer, a simple but quite perplexing question: Why are there so many flaws, anomalies, and impossibilities in the 9/11 OS?

 

Andy Nowicki is a blogger, vlogger, and writer. Visit his author page, his Amazon page, and his YouTube channel.